The galaxy is constructed to be in equilibrium in absence of the time-dependent tidal field. During the first
years1), the system achieves a new
approximate equilibrium. A slow ramp-up of the tidal terms in
equation (1) yield larger initial transients. During the
initial virialization phase, the disk responds strongly in its outer
parts to the full non-inertial set of forces although the total mass
involved is small. The inner disk oscillates as it phase mixes under
the fully consistent self-potential and external galactic potential.
Both effects have little effect on scale height. A simulation with
the same initial conditions but with nmax increased by a factor
of two shows the same behavior.
The LMC disk precesses under the torque from the Galaxy. Uncorrected,
this would cause the expansion plane to drift away from the true disk
plane defined by the instantaneous mean angular momentum. To follow
this, the disk bodies are ranked by binding energy and the lowest 2%
are used to determine the disk angular momentum vector and expansion
center. To damp any numerical feedback, both the expansion plane and
center are determined from a 100 time step running average.
This precession is shown in Figure 4 which shows the
azimuth of the LMC disk's angular momentum axis in the original frame.
The disk also nutates, as seen in Figure 5, because of
the initial transient. The initial angle between the mean angular
momentum vector perpendicular to the disk and the Galactic center is
.
Although a non-nutating system might be achieved by
iterating the initial angular momentum vector, there is little reason
to assume this is closer to the natural state, so no corrections have
been made.
![]() |
![]() |
At the same time, the LMC halo and disk have a mutual self-gravitating response that causes a slow m=1 oscillation of the disk density center. The existence of such weakly damped modes can be demonstrated analytically using the methods described by Weinberg (1994d). Because of these modes and the fact that mass and momentum loss in the Galactic tidal field is asymmetric, the potential expansion is chosen to track the density center. Although the force solver can handle this situation, the secular heating of disk increases. Tests without the tidal field confirm that this effect does not dominate or obscure the tidal heating (cf. Fig. 6).
The disk thickness is estimated from the density distribution in a
column through the LMC at a radius of a disk scale length. The disk
plane is inferred by the same method used to orient the force
expansion (see §3.2). The line of sight inclination is
chosen to be
and azimuthally averaged at one LMC disk scale
length. The line of sight quantities are computed by selecting
tracers in a pencil along the line of sight and estimating the
one-dimensional density distribution using optimal kernel smoothing
(Silverman 1986). The quantity
denotes the half width corresponding to the mass enclosed within one
Gaussian standard deviation. To convert to scale height h of the
equivalent isothermal slab, an explicit evaluation determines that
.
With a
inclination, this is
.
The variance of the velocity distribution of
stars along the line of sight is denoted
.
Figure 6 shows h and
.
There are two clear
trends: 1) the thickness of the disk increases; and 2) the velocity
dispersion very slowly decreases. The slope, shown as a
straight solid line in Figure 6, is
.
The
evolved n-body disk has an approximately exponential profile, as also
predicted by the semi-analytic computation. The linear increase in
h with time is predicted by the underlying resonance theory and is
a natural consequence of secular evolution.
The decrease in velocity dispersion seems counterintuitive at first glance but is often seen in globular cluster evolution. In a fixed gravitational potential, the heating would go into kinetic energy. However, the work done on the self-gravitating disk decreases the depth of the potential well and, by the virial theorem, also decreases the kinetic energy. The relative velocity dispersion tends to increase owing to the increased orbital eccentricity and a larger projection of the velocity along the line of sight caused by increasing orbital inclination. However this is not enough to offset the overall decrease in kinetic energy and the magnitude of the dispersion decreases.
In summary, the effect of the heating is significant although not as dramatic as in the analytic computation that ignores the disk's self gravity.
![]() |
Figure 7 describes the mass loss as a function of
time. Mass beyond the LMC tidal radius is assumed to be lost. Loss
of dark halo material, disk stars and total are shown separately with
the orbital pericenters indicated as vertical dotted lines. Roughly
10% of the halo and 3% of the disk is lost by
.
The halo
material is lost episodically, with the peak loss just past every
pericenter. The disk stars are lost at a roughly steady rate. A
total mass of
or 7% of the original mass is lost
by
.
The spatial distribution of the LMC disk at this point
is shown in Figure 8 in both edge-on and face-on
projection. The colors here range from blue to red, orange, yellow
and finally white as the mass density increases logarithmically. The
outlying stellar spheroid that has been heated out of the disk is
fairly tenuous and the edge-on disk is thinner than it appears.
Figure 9 highlights the distribution of lost mass
for both stars and halo material. In this figure, the lowest
densities are shown as white. Recall, the relative number of points
at different radii in these plots do not trace mass; the lower binding
energies are preferentially represented as described in
§3.2.2 in order to better resolve the mass loss.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |